Menstrual carbon footprint; because it affects global warming

Menstrual waste impact; due to its contribution to landfill mass

Period pollution; because it affects air quality

Hygiene footprint; due to its use of water resources

It contains more platelets

It's purely water

It contains menstrual tissue and cells from the uterine lining

There's no difference

They can lead to increased menstrual flow

They may disrupt the natural vaginal flora and pH balance

They cause immediate allergic reactions in all users

They have a cooling effect that can be uncomfortable

Biodegradable tampons

Period underwear with built-in absorbent layers

Reusable plastic pads

Single-use menstrual sponges

They have no impact

Positive attitudes can lead to better access to information and products

They only affect the cost of products

Societal attitudes increase the effectiveness of products

It complicates the discussion unnecessarily

Recognizing that not only women menstruate promotes inclusivity and access for all individuals experiencing menstruation

It's only relevant in certain countries

Gender has no impact on menstrual hygiene needs

Sea sponges

Silk cloths

Wax-coated paper

Bark and leaves

Ensuring that only the most expensive products are available

Availability and affordability of menstrual products for all menstruating individuals

Promoting one type of menstrual product over others

Limiting discussions to certain age groups

It highlights the abundance of menstrual products available globally

It refers to the economic and social barriers that prevent access to menstrual products

It's a marketing strategy by menstrual product companies

It suggests that menstrual products are overpriced globally

Products should have a high pH to clean more effectively

Maintaining a pH that matches the natural vaginal environment helps prevent irritation

pH balance is only important for edible products

Lower pH products are always better

Cups are more visually appealing

They significantly reduce menstrual waste over time

They are easier to find in stores

Cups can be shared among users

To avoid staining clothes

To maintain proper hygiene and cleanliness

To prevent odor

All of the above

To prepare them for their own periods

To reduce stigma and increase support for menstruating individuals

Men are responsible for purchasing all menstrual products

It has no importance

They universally promote the best hygiene practices

Some practices may limit access to or information about proper menstrual hygiene

Cultural practices do not influence menstrual hygiene

They ensure that everyone uses the same type of menstrual product

Determining the color preferences for menstrual products

Overcoming taboos and stigmas to gather accurate data

Finding participants for surveys

Deciding on the fragrance for products

It's only necessary for washing menstrual cups

Essential for cleaning and managing menstruation safely, affecting overall health

It makes menstrual blood blue

Water access has no impact on menstrual hygiene

They are solely responsible for product innovation

Providing education and addressing health concerns related to menstruation

Marketing menstrual products

None, menstrual hygiene is not a health issue

Incorrect disposal can contribute to environmental pollution and pose health risks

All menstrual products are biodegradable

Disposal methods determine the effectiveness of the product

Products are designed to be flushed down toilets

Every 12 hours

Every 48 hours

Every 6 hours

Every 48 hours

By creating products that last a lifetime

Designing fully biodegradable options that perform as well as current products

Eliminating the need for menstruation

Focusing solely on aesthetic improvements

It ensures equal access to menstrual products worldwide

It creates significant barriers to accessing safe and effective menstrual products for many

Economic factors are unrelated to menstrual hygiene access

Wealthier countries require more menstrual hygiene products

No significant impact has been observed.

Improved menstrual hygiene correlates with lower rates of reproductive diseases.

It primarily affects mental health, not physical health.

It increases global warming.

They dictate the color and design of products chosen.

Economic constraints can limit access to a variety of products, affecting hygiene and comfort.

People with higher incomes prefer menstrual cups.

There's a direct correlation between income and preference for scented products.

They are too expensive for widespread use.

If not disposed of properly, they may not degrade and can contribute to landfill waste.

They are less effective than traditional products.

Biodegradable products are a myth; no such products exist.

Access to luxury menstrual products is limited.

Lack of access to clean water and safe sanitary products complicates hygiene practices.

There's an overabundance of products, making choices difficult.

Digital menstrual tracking apps are not available.

By making menstrual products glow in the dark.

Through innovations in biodegradable materials and menstrual health apps for better tracking and education.

By eliminating menstruation entirely through technological means.

Technology has no role in improving menstrual hygiene.

It encourages more open discussion about menstruation.

Stigma can lead to misinformation and neglect of proper hygiene practices.

It makes menstruation a popular topic.

Stigma has been entirely eradicated.

It's irrelevant in the age of the internet.

Comprehensive education can lead to better health outcomes and empowerment.

Education only complicates simple hygiene practices.

It decreases the quality of menstrual hygiene.

Cultural perceptions have no real impact on hygiene practices.

Positive or negative cultural perceptions can significantly influence access to information and comfort in discussing and managing menstruation.

They make menstrual products more colorful.

Cultural perceptions only affect product pricing.

Products that require no changing or maintenance.

More inclusive designs, sustainable materials, and affordable options to accommodate diverse bodies and socioeconomic statuses.

Menstrual products that also act as fashion accessories.

Products that can predict future menstrual cycles.

Choosing disposal methods that align with local recycling and waste management policies.

Burning used products to reduce waste.

Disposing of all menstrual products in natural water bodies.

Using the same product for multiple cycles to reduce waste.

That menstruation attracts wild animals.

Menstrual blood is harmful and unclean; menstruating individuals should be isolated; and that certain products can affect virginity.

That all menstrual products are the same.

Debunking myths is not necessary.

By limiting access to menstrual products.

Through global legislation that mandates free access to menstrual products, education, and the elimination of taxes on these products.

By making all menstrual products reusable.

Through celebrity endorsements of menstrual products.

They primarily focus on product advertisements.

They distribute free menstrual products, provide education, and work to destigmatize menstruation in various communities.

Their role is limited to conducting surveys.

They discourage the use of modern menstrual products.

Increased risk of reproductive tract infections (RTIs) and potentially impacting overall reproductive health.

There are no health risks; it's purely a cosmetic issue.

Immediate allergic reactions to all menstrual products.

Loss of menstrual cycle memory.

It has made menstrual products less necessary.

Providing a platform for sharing information, resources, and personal experiences, thereby increasing awareness and access.

The internet has introduced too much false information, worsening hygiene practices.

Online platforms are irrelevant to menstrual hygiene.

Menstrual hygiene is not a priority in such settings.

Ensuring access to sanitary products, clean water, and safe disposal methods to prevent additional health risks.

Focusing solely on food and shelter, neglecting menstrual needs.

Using traditional methods only, as modern products are unsuitable.

It has no impact on education.

Lack of access to menstrual products can lead to missed school days, affecting education and opportunities.

It improves concentration in educational settings.

Period poverty increases educational resources.

Products that eliminate menstruation altogether.

Developments in eco-friendly materials, wearable technology for tracking health metrics, and increased personalization of products to meet individual needs.

A return to traditional methods without modern products.

Menstrual products that change color with mood.